Photo Blocker Spray to Stop Tickets in the Mail

Friday, March 26, 2010

Obama may be Illegal Alien- Court Action

Does this suprise me? Not in the least, we have no record of this manchurian candidate. Obama is making the Bushes, look like the second coming of Thomas Jefferson. Need we discuss what they call the Healthcare bill? There is a functional 21% unemployment rate nationwide, but we need mandated healthcare that I do not want or need. Better yet, I will need to pay for my employees healthcare and their families, but somehow Obama is providing healthcare to the uninsured? Well, I am the uninsured and like it just fine that way. Give me Sodium Ascorbate and you can keep your H1N1 vaccines.
Well, anyway this article is yet another court challenge to the legitimacy of Obama's candidacy as president. He is alledged to be a dual citizen and a british one at that; the arch-enemies of the Republic.
Court told 'citizen' Obama actually may be alien
'Under British Nationality Act … he was a British subject'
Posted: March 25, 2010
12:00 am Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Forget the dispute over the "natural born citizen" requirement of the U.S. Constitution for presidents, Barack Obama may not even be a "citizen," according to a new filing in a long-running legal challenge to his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.

"Under the British Nationality Act of 1948 his father was a British subject/citizen and not a United States citizen and Obama himself was a British subject/citizen at the time Obama was born," says a new filing in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in the case Kerchner v. Obama.

"We further contend that Obama has failed to even conclusively prove that he is at least a 'citizen of the United States' under the Fourteenth Amendment as he claims by conclusively proving that he was born in Hawaii."

The submission comes from attorney Mario Apuzzo, who is handling the case. His brief argues against the earlier document from Obama's attorneys demanding that the case be dismissed.

WND reported when the lawyer argued that the most common reason judges have used to dismiss cases against Obama – a lack of "standing" – is just wrong.

Obama's argument for dismissal relies almost exclusively on standing.

"How can you deny he's affecting me?" Apuzzo said recently during an interview with WND. "He wants to have terror trials in New York. He published the CIA interrogation techniques. On and on. He goes around bowing and doing all these different things. His statements we're not a Christian nation; we're one of the largest Muslim nations. It's all there."



The case was brought by Apuzzo in January 2009 on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr.

Named as defendants are Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives, former Vice President Dick Cheney and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The case alleges Congress failed to follow the Constitution, which "provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate 'elected' by the Electoral College Electors."

The complaint also asserts "when Obama was born his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same." The case contends the framers of the U.S. Constitution, when they adopted the requirement that a president be a "natural born citizen," excluded dual citizens.
Continued @ Source

For lowcost Healthcare, there is electro-medicine, pre-dates the Federal Reserve and the wonderful corresponding alphabet agencies.

No comments: